Inspect one shipment and defend the decision
A 12,000-piece order of a mid-weight cotton knit polo is finished and packed in three colours. The buyer's programme works to a normal single sampling plan and treats measurement failures as major defects. You are the person who inspects the lot, writes the report and signs the accept or reject decision. Use your own factory's style and figures if you have them; otherwise use this order.
Who this is for: QA and QC officers, final inspectors, quality managers, and merchandisers who have to read and defend an inspection report.
What you produce: A one-page inspection file: the control plan extract, the sampling plan you applied, the defect tally with each fault classified, the accept or reject decision with its reason, and the corrective action you raised.
Nobody marks this for you. Write your own answer, compare it with the guidance under each task, then mark the capstone done when you are satisfied with it. Your writing is saved on this device, and to your account when you sign in.
Task 1
Write the control-plan extract for the three checks you rely on most for this style: state the check, the standard applied, the sample and frequency, who reacts and what they do.
What a good answer contains: A good answer names a measurable standard for each check (a tolerance, a test method, a pass rule), not 'as per buyer'. It gives each check an owner and a written reaction, so a failure has a route and not just a comment.
0/1500 characters — saved when you click away.
Task 2
State the sampling plan you will apply to the 12,000 pieces: inspection level, the AQL your programme uses, the sample size, and the accept and reject numbers. Explain how you arrived at each figure.
What a good answer contains: A good answer shows the reasoning — lot size band, inspection level, AQL — and states the accept and reject numbers as the buyer's published plan gives them, rather than an invented table. It says explicitly which document the plan comes from, and what it would do if the buyer's plan is not available.
0/1500 characters — saved when you click away.
Task 3
Classify these ten findings as critical, major or minor and say why: broken needle fragment in one collar; 2 cm chest measurement over tolerance on three pieces; shaded sleeve on one piece against the body; open seam 4 cm at side seam; loose thread ends on twelve pieces; wrong care label language on the whole carton; pilling on one sample after wash; missing size sticker on eight pieces; oil mark 1 cm on a front panel; button spacing 5 mm out on two pieces.
What a good answer contains: A good answer treats safety findings as critical and stops the lot, treats anything the customer will return or refuse as major, and keeps cosmetic and correctable items minor. It notices that a wrong care label on a whole carton is a compliance problem rather than a sampling problem and handles it separately.
0/1500 characters — saved when you click away.
Task 4
Give your accept or reject decision against your stated plan, then write what you would tell the merchandiser if the lot fails and the vessel closes in 48 hours.
What a good answer contains: A good answer applies its own accept and reject numbers honestly rather than negotiating the standard afterwards. The message to the merchandiser gives options with consequences — sort and re-inspect, partial shipment, buyer concession request — and never hides a failure to hold a date.
0/1500 characters — saved when you click away.
Task 5
Raise the corrective and preventive action for the largest defect group: containment, root cause, the permanent fix, and how you will know it worked.
What a good answer contains: A good answer separates containment (what protects the customer today) from root cause (why the process produced it), gives the permanent fix an owner and a date, and names the measure — defect rate, capability, audit result — that shows the fix held.
0/1500 characters — saved when you click away.
0/5 tasks have a written answer