Intentional versus unwanted effects
Lesson 3 of 4
Objective
Separate approved design effects from defects, without confusing appearance with structural integrity.
Technical explanation
Compare abrasion, grinding, distressing and holes with the approved design and their permitted location and extent.
An effect being intentional does not automatically make it structurally acceptable. A destroyed area near a load-bearing seam or attachment needs a construction and safety assessment.
Record suspected causes as hypotheses for the wash or production team to investigate.
AI-generated training image — verify on a physical garment.
Observation question
What two checks do you need before deciding whether this opening is an intended effect or damage?
Worked case
Worked case: thigh abrasion and a pocket-side hole
Thigh abrasion is shown on the approved reference. A similar-looking hole beside a load-bearing pocket attachment is not.
Document location and extent, then consult construction and safety criteria. Do not decide purely on fashionable appearance.
Common mistakes
- Passing any hole because the style is 'distressed'.
- Ignoring location relative to seams and attachments.
- Stating a root cause as fact.
Your action
List the effects on your current approved wash and their permitted locations.