Skip to content
Skip to content
GARMENT Ed
Public reference reading

You are reading this page as a free public reference resource. Sign in with a free learner account to follow the structured course, where each step unlocks only after the previous one is passed.

Sign in to follow the course

Module 4 · Lesson 13 of 22

Variance and standard-deviation comparisons

← Back to moduleBack to academy
Listen to this article
Ready
100% Free

This lesson and the entire Lean Six Sigma Black Belt academy are free of charge — no fees, ever.

Learning objectives

  • Compare spreads between groups.
  • Choose robust methods when normality is suspect.
  • Interpret variance ratios in operational terms.

Why variance matters

Two methods can share a mean but differ in spread. In garment conformance, tighter spread often matters more than a slightly better mean because tolerances are two-sided.

Chi-square and F methods are sensitive to normality; Levene / Brown-Forsythe methods are more robust.

Garment-factory example

Two sewing methods have equal mean seam allowance but Method B has σ = 0.6 mm versus Method A σ = 1.1 mm — Method B is preferable because both spec limits are within reach.

Method

  1. Plot spread by group and by time.
  2. Check stability before comparison.
  3. Use a robust test in a free tool.
  4. Report ratio and CI; investigate mechanism.

Common mistakes

  • Comparing σ on unstable, mixed data.
  • Claiming lower spread without an uncertainty range.

Knowledge check

Pick one answer per question. Explanations appear after you submit.

  1. 1. Equal means with unequal spreads:

  2. 2. Levene / Brown-Forsythe is used because:

Author: NOSK.life · Last reviewed: 2026-07-21

Structured certification

Opening your learning…

© NOSK.LIFE — training content for personal learning on NOSK.LIFE only. Copying or reuse requires written permission.