Skip to content
Skip to content
GARMENT Ed
Public reference reading

You are reading this page as a free public reference resource. Sign in with a free learner account to follow the structured course, where each step unlocks only after the previous one is passed.

Sign in to follow the course

Module 4 · Lesson 1 of 22

Analyze-phase strategy and evidence hierarchy

← Back to moduleBack to academy
Listen to this article
Ready
100% Free

This lesson and the entire Lean Six Sigma Black Belt academy are free of charge — no fees, ever.

Learning objectives

  • State the intent of Analyze in one sentence.
  • Sequence process-door and data-door evidence.
  • Set an evidence hierarchy for cause claims.

What Analyze must deliver

Analyze converts hypotheses into confirmed root causes. Every cause must be observable, testable and controllable before it becomes a candidate for Improve.

The evidence hierarchy runs from anecdote → stratified data → statistical test → replicated experiment or removal/reappearance evidence.

Garment-factory example

A puckering hypothesis is downgraded from ‘folder alignment’ (anecdote) to ‘folder alignment on fabric construction X above speed Y’ once stratified data and a small test confirm the mechanism.

Method

  1. Restate the Y and known baseline.
  2. List candidate Xs with source (process-door or data-door).
  3. Plan tests that could disprove each cause.
  4. Rank surviving Xs by strength of evidence.

Common mistakes

  • Skipping to solutions before causes are confirmed.
  • Accepting seniority as evidence.

Knowledge check

Pick one answer per question. Explanations appear after you submit.

  1. 1. A root cause must be:

  2. 2. In the evidence hierarchy, replicated experiment ranks:

Author: NOSK.life · Last reviewed: 2026-07-21

Structured certification

Opening your learning…

© NOSK.LIFE — training content for personal learning on NOSK.LIFE only. Copying or reuse requires written permission.