Public reference reading You are reading this page as a free public reference resource. Sign in with a free learner account to follow the structured course, where each step unlocks only after the previous one is passed.
Sign in to follow the course Academy › Improve › Applied assessment Applied assessment · Module 5
Applied assessment — selecting and piloting solutions Score competing solution ideas objectively, size a simple experiment or line-balance fix correctly, and judge whether pilot results justify full rollout.
Every question asks you to decide, judge or calculate from a situation rather than recall a definition. 5 questions, 75 per cent to pass, as many attempts as you like, and your best score is kept on this device. Free, and a self-study assessment rather than an accredited examination.
4 of 5 needed to pass
1. A team scores three proposed fixes for late deliveries on a weighted decision matrix (cost, feasibility, impact on CTQ, implementation time): Fix A scores 7.2, Fix B scores 8.6, Fix C scores 6.9. The plant manager personally prefers Fix A because 'it feels simpler.' What should the team do? Choose one answer.
Present Fix B as the data-supported top choice, and if the manager still prefers Fix A, revisit the matrix weights or evidence together rather than silently overriding the score Average all three scores and implement a blended solution Discard the decision matrix, since it disagreed with the manager Follow the plant manager's preference regardless of the matrix, since seniority should decide
2. A sewing line has 6 operations with cycle times of 40, 55, 38, 62, 45, and 50 seconds. Customer demand requires a takt time of 48 seconds. What does line balancing analysis show, and what is the priority action? Choose one answer.
Only the fastest operation (38 seconds) needs attention since it is 'wasting' capacity Takt time is irrelevant once cycle times are known The line is already balanced since the average cycle time is close to 48 seconds Operations at 55 and 62 seconds exceed takt time and will bottleneck the line; these should be prioritized for work redistribution or method improvement
3. A team plans a 2-factor, 2-level factorial DOE on stitch defect rate, testing thread tension (low/high) and needle size (fine/standard), with 3 replicates per combination. How many total experimental runs are needed? Choose one answer.
8 runs, since replicates only apply to two of the four combinations 4 runs (one per combination, no replication) 6 runs 12 runs (4 combinations x 3 replicates)
4. A pilot of a new inspection checkpoint runs for one shift only, on the best-performing operator, and shows defects dropping from 6% to 1%. The team wants to declare success and roll out plant-wide immediately. What is the concern? Choose one answer.
None — a clear improvement was shown so rollout should proceed immediately The pilot's single shift, single best-operator design likely overstates the expected result under normal, mixed-skill, multi-shift conditions; a broader or longer pilot is needed before full rollout The pilot should be rejected outright because any improvement below 0% is insufficient The 6% to 1% change is too large to be believed, so the data must be fabricated
5. Two future-state process designs both meet the CTQ target. Design 1 costs BDT 300,000 to implement and saves an estimated BDT 40,000/month. Design 2 costs BDT 900,000 and saves an estimated BDT 150,000/month. Using simple payback period, which is faster to pay back and by how much? Choose one answer.
Design 1 pays back in 7.5 months, Design 2 in 6 months — Design 2 pays back 1.5 months faster Both pay back in exactly the same time since both meet the CTQ Design 1 pays back faster because it costs less overall Design 1 pays back in 7.5 months versus Design 2's 6 months, so Design 2 pays back faster
← Back to the module All modules Structured certification Opening your learning…
© NOSK.LIFE — training content for personal learning on NOSK.LIFE only. Copying or reuse requires written permission.