Public reference reading You are reading this page as a free public reference resource. Sign in with a free learner account to follow the structured course, where each step unlocks only after the previous one is passed.
Sign in to follow the course Academy › Define › Applied assessment Applied assessment · Module 2
Applied assessment — scoping a Define-phase project Turn a vague factory complaint into a scoped charter with a defensible problem statement, SIPOC boundaries, and CTQs grounded in the voice of the customer.
Every question asks you to decide, judge or calculate from a situation rather than recall a definition. 5 questions, 75 per cent to pass, as many attempts as you like, and your best score is kept on this device. Free, and a self-study assessment rather than an accredited examination.
4 of 5 needed to pass
1. A merchandiser writes this problem statement: 'The finishing department is careless and needs better supervisors.' What is the main flaw in this statement for a Define-phase charter? Choose one answer.
It does not mention the customer by name It should be written by the Black Belt instead of the merchandiser It is too short to be useful It assumes a root cause (carelessness, weak supervision) instead of stating the observed gap in measurable terms
2. During VOC collection, a buyer says, 'Deliveries always feel late.' Which technique correctly converts this into a usable CTQ for the project charter? Choose one answer.
Ask the production manager to restate the buyer's need on the buyer's behalf Record the quote verbatim as the CTQ and move on Translate the underlying need into a specific, measurable requirement, such as 'orders shipped within 2 days of the confirmed ex-factory date' Ignore the comment since 'always' is an exaggeration
3. A team draws a SIPOC for a rejected-garment-reduction project and lists 'yarn dyeing supplier' as a Supplier, 'fabric inspection' as the first Process step, and 'buyer's quality auditor' as a Customer. The scope statement, however, says the project covers only sewing and finishing. What should the team do? Choose one answer.
Leave the SIPOC as is, since suppliers and customers are always included regardless of scope Delete fabric inspection from the SIPOC entirely since it is out of scope Align the SIPOC's process boundaries with the charter's stated scope, starting the Process column at sewing input rather than fabric inspection Expand the charter scope to match the SIPOC instead of adjusting the SIPOC
4. In a Kano analysis, buyers say a hangtag being correctly attached is something they 'never mention because they simply expect it,' while a slightly earlier delivery date 'would be a pleasant surprise but isn't required.' How should these two be classified? Choose one answer.
Correct hangtag attachment is a Must-be requirement; earlier delivery is an Attractive/Delighter requirement Correct hangtag attachment is a Delighter; earlier delivery is a Must-be requirement Both are One-dimensional requirements since both relate to buyer satisfaction Both are Delighters, since both improve buyer satisfaction
5. A charter lists this financial benefit: 'Reducing rejects will save the company money.' The sponsor asks for a more defensible version before approving the project. Which revision best satisfies Define-phase rigor? Choose one answer.
'Rejects are bad and should be eliminated as soon as possible.' 'The team will work hard to reduce rejects using Six Sigma tools.' 'This project is important and management supports it fully.' 'Reducing the reject rate from 6% to 3% on this style is estimated to avoid approximately BDT 500,000 per month in rework and re-cutting cost, based on current volumes.'
← Back to the module All modules Structured certification Opening your learning…
© NOSK.LIFE — training content for personal learning on NOSK.LIFE only. Copying or reuse requires written permission.