Public reference reading You are reading this page as a free public reference resource. Sign in with a free learner account to follow the structured course, where each step unlocks only after the previous one is passed.
Sign in to follow the course Academy › Critical Thinking and Root Cause › Applied assessment Applied assessment · Module 13
English 🔒 বাংলা
Bangla is being improved for factory-floor accuracy and native wording. It will return once the review is complete. English is available now.
Applied Assessment: Critical Thinking and Root Cause Judge how to separate symptoms from root causes and apply evidence-based 5 Why and containment discipline to quality failures.
5 situations, 75 per cent to pass, unlimited attempts, and your best score is kept on this device. Free, and a self-study assessment rather than an accredited examination.
4 of 5 needed to pass
1. Final inspection shows an 8% defect rate on trousers. The team blames operators and adds extra inline checks, but the defect rate returns to 7% within two days. What does this suggest? Choose one answer.
Inline checks are useless and should be removed entirely The defect rate will naturally resolve itself over time The operators need one more round of disciplinary warnings The team stopped at a convenient explanation instead of investigating the real cause with evidence
2. Before asking 'why' about a DHU spike, what should a manager collect first? Choose one answer.
A general apology letter drafted for the buyer Opinions from the most senior person on the floor Evidence such as stitch photos, machine settings, needle logs and operator rotation records A list of which operators to reassign immediately
3. A buyer reports shade variation between left and right panels of a shirt. What is the correct order of action? Choose one answer.
Correct the process first, then investigate whether the fix was needed Contain the affected stock immediately for customer protection, then investigate with evidence and a 5 Why chain, then apply corrective action Blame the fabric supplier publicly before checking any evidence Wait for the next shipment to see if the issue repeats before doing anything
4. In a 5 Why investigation, when should the chain of questioning stop? Choose one answer.
After exactly five questions regardless of what the evidence shows When the evidence points to a genuine process or system gap, not merely when the story feels complete When the operator involved agrees to accept the blame As soon as any plausible-sounding answer is given
5. Once the needle-heat root cause is confirmed, what should the corrective action address? Choose one answer.
A one-time bonus for the operators to improve morale A public notice blaming the previous shift for the defect Only the specific pieces that failed the current inspection The needle-change standard and supervisor training so the same failure cannot repeat on future orders
← Back to the module All modules Structured certification Opening your learning…
© NOSK.LIFE — training content for personal learning on NOSK.LIFE only. Copying or reuse requires written permission.